環保車也可以不環保

Central Connecticut State University 的學生出版物

The Recorder – Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental Damage
http://clubs.ccsu.edu/recorder/editorial/editorial_item.asp?NewsID=188

指用生命週期 (Life Cycle) 的一切損耗計算,混燃車 (Hybrid car)

Toyota Prius
http://www.toyota.com/prius-hybrid/index.html

比美國著名軍用車 (有民用版)

HUMMER
http://www.hummer.com/

Hummer. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved March 28, 2007, from Answers.com Web site: http://www.answers.com/topic/hummer-1

更唔環保。為了解真相,我的環保資料首選

Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)
http://www.rmi.org/

就俾到我

RMI – Transportation – Hypercar Vehicle Resources
http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid394.php

On the Road in 2020: A life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies
http://web.mit.edu/energylab/www/pubs/el00-003.pdf

文章是

massachusetts institute of technology (MIT)
http://web.mit.edu/

Laboratory for Energy and the Environment (LFEE)
http://lfee.mit.edu/

出的研究報告

LFEE reports
http://lfee.mit.edu/metadot/index.pl?id=2234

EL 00-003
Weiss, M.A., J. Heywood, A. Schafer, E. Drake and F. AuYeng, On the Road in 2020, a Life-cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies, September 2000, pp 156.
http://lfee.mit.edu/public/el00-003.pdf

雖然文件已有七年歷史,而預測的又是十多年後的情況,但對比目前,數據仍具有參考價值。

簡言之,縱使鋁不是製造現今混燃車的主要物料,但只要是每年行 20,000 公里,行足 15 年 (即是 300,000 公里),它依然是最有能源效益的車。就算是電池車或燃料電池車,除非技術有重大突破,否則它們也不及混燃車。

在美國,Toyota Prius 的混燃相關零件有 8 years/100,000 miles (160,000 kilometers) 的保用;在加州及部分州份更長達 10 years/150,000 miles (240,000 kilometers)。

Toyota – Hybrid Hype? Fact and Fiction Surrounding the New Technology
http://www.toyota.com/about/environment/technology/2004/hybrid.html

Toyota 根據實驗數據指出車行了 180,000 miles,電池也不會老化,更指它的壽命可支撐到車退役時。

所以

CNW Marketing Research
http://cnwmr.com/

用 100,000 miles 來計 Prius,而用 300,000 miles (480,000 kilometers) 來計 Hummer 是很不公平的。不過這也提醒了我們一件事,就是車的壽命是很長的,無論部車是否環保慳油車,貪新忘舊頻換車的結果絕對是負面的。

News via

Engadget – Questionable report claims Hummer is greener than Prius
http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/24/questionable-report-claims-hummer-is-greener-than-prius/

Hummer Greener Than Prius?
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/20/1858204

補充 (Apr 18, 2007)

The Car Connection – Prius Versus HUMMER: Exploding the Myth
http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Green_Car_News/Prius_Versus_HUMMER_Exploding_the_Myth.S196.A12220.html

via

AutoblogGreen – The Car Connection tackles Prius vs Hummer controversy
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/04/17/the-car-connection-tackles-prius-vs-hummer-controversy/

補充 (Dec 31, 2007)

Rocky Mountain Institute – T07-01, Dust to Dust
http://www.rmi.org/images/PDFs/Transportation/T07-01_DustToDust.pdf

2 Responses to “環保車也可以不環保”

  1. sooffadmin Says:

    我正好在search環保的東西~ 我又多一點認識所謂的環保~ :)

  2. Alan Says:

    很好很好… RMI 提供了豐富的資料,請你務必一看。

    Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)
    http://www.rmi.org/


Leave a Reply